Friday 16 August 2013

Innovators or Pirates

Are all remixers (including mashup artists, DJs, pastiche and bricolage producers and digital media artists) innovators or thieves? Should you pay for every sample used in a recording or piece of video art?

Personally speaking, I think remixers cannot be divided into innovator or thieves absolutely, because the artists have their own creative but sometimes by using others ideas for the inspiration. This is legal when they use others original works to make some editions or changes to form their own artistic productions. ‘The problem is that innovation does not exist in a vacuum. Ideas and inspiration bubble up from the sources around us’ (Gettler, 2004). I agree with this statement because our world is full of different kinds of information, any productions may take examples by others relative productions. For example, before MP3 comes out, people use Walkman to listen to music, MP3 can be seen as the advanced results of ‘Walkman’.       

Remix includes many types of artistic creations such as mashup artists, pastiche, DJs and various mainstreams. In relating to music field, remix is a musical form to use many other types of music such as hip-pop, R&B, Jazz etc. to take shapes in a particular remix music production. Remixers can be seen as a creation of artistic style, it blends diversified elements in different views of arts, but it uses for reference of those existent artworks. For instance, a song with a remix version is based on the changes of the original song. Furthermore, many Japanese singers like to make remix versions of their songs to create a new music album, then selling in the market for some commercial purposes. There is a remix version of <Heaven>, the original song is made by piano instrumental. It sang by a famous Japanese female singer Hamasaki Ayumi.


The development of the Internet and MP3s – digitally compressed music files – opened up an alternative mode of distribution’ (Martin, Moore & Salter, 2010). With answering the question should I pay for every sample used in a recording or piece of video art? My response may be no. Actually, nowadays many people will choose to download music from the Internet rather than to buy the album CDs. It becomes a convenient and fast way to enjoy the music better than pay for it. However, this may impact to those music industries, downloading MP3 freely on the Internet can cause the decrease of selling recording CDs. Despite the defect, Internet is a good platform for those digital media artists, they can create their artworks by using Internet sources freely and made to their own artistic creations.


Reference

Gettler, L 2004, ‘Balancing battle between pirates and innovators’, retrieved 30 April 2004, < http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/04/29/1083224515491.html>.

Martin, B, Moore, C and Salter, C. 2010, ‘Sharing music files: tactics of a challenge to the industry’, First Monday, vol. 15, no. 12 <http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2986/2680>.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wqDEKywPxs

6 comments:

  1. Good piece Yuehan, I enjoyed reading your post. It really is a trick topic to discuss whether remixers are innovators or pirates. First of all, I think as audiences, we do benefit a lot from remixed music as it provide us varied versions of songs we familiar with, and sometimes, I have to admit, re-created version is even better and well-known than the original one. I totally agree with the point you made that every art work we have today may be inspired by other project. To improve, I think you can make your views more clear in the blog. BTW, I like the song you chose. Cheer.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Yue

    I think you're right about how to choose remixes as innovators or pirates. They are neither.
    EVERYONE borrows a little, when creating - it's called INSPIRATION! And this is how you create ideas, arts, well anything.
    And if you create a selling idea you can be sure people will copy you. And why not enjoying making people happy? You got inspired by someone too, when you made the idea.

    Thanks for the post!

    Silja

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hello Yue Han,

    I agree with the points you made; but I guess it might all come down to intent. Is the artist using a sample and getting inspired, or is (s)he basically redoing the same thing? Is it inspiration that aims at self-expression, or is it copying that aims at stealing a share of the original artist's potential revenue?

    On one hand, I would agree that anything goes, yet on the other hand I would say that it can be very wrong in the case of an opportunistic endeavour (I think that was your first point). This being said, it might be that the opportunistic artist manages to improve upon the 'original', as Olive pointed out, so that would cease from being wrong if the copying artist shares an adequate part of the revenues with the copied artist.

    I guess my point here is that I would only frown upon a remix if it were poorly and clumsily produced through the music industry to quickly profit from someone else's popularity whilst it lasts.
    Independent artists who are not backed up by big labels shouldn't have to pay for the samples they use, unless they start making a substantial profit from the remix; but those backed up by the big labels should see that these labels pay for the samples out of the huge cut they get from the sales of CD's and tickets.

    Thank you,

    Jean-Antoine

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 12. Hey, I enjoyed reading your post, it presented me with an opposing opinion to my own which is always interesting to read. I agree with you that "Ideas and inspiration bubble up from the sources around us" but I think there is a pretty clear difference between inspiration and blatant copying, therefore think people who remix songs should have to pay royalties or be punished. Overall I think your post was successful in communicating your point of view, however there were a few grammatical errors and spelling mistakes throughout the post that affected the flow of your post and made it a little difficult to read at times. Other than that it was well structured and your choice of video complimented you post well. Keep up the good work!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi everyone, I am Adorjan Adelmo from Yasinya village Ukraine and I just want to say a very resounding thanks  to Pedro Financial loan services for their sincerity, Openness, Transparency, Truthfulness, Love and support during and after getting loan funds from them. I have been through a lot in the hands of in life and time won’t permit me to say all that I went through in the year of pandemic but God answered my prayers through the support and love from pedro Financial loan services who embraced me and understood me despite my initial doubt and unseriousness and with his good heart and love I am now a home owner through his 3% interest rate loan funds and I have vow to spread this news and also tell the world that there are still genuine and few good online loan firms out there that can assist and also revive a dry bone like I was.
    Don’t fail to listen and read this testimony because this is a true life changing experience and anyone that needs this kind of turn around should not hesitate or doubt this because I have proven and I swear to God in Heaven that this story is real and also the story of my experience with them .
    Contact them today for Consolidated loan, business loan, home loan, car loan, personal loan.

    Email:    pedroloanss@gmail.com
    Whats-App: +1-8632310632

    ReplyDelete