Can the
blogosphere act as independent and impartial public sphere?
The blogosphere is made up with all the forms of blogs includes Google Blog and micro blog platforms such as Twitter and Sina microblog. ‘It also a term some writers have used to describe the grassroots and interactive journalism in blogs and the symbiotic relationship between bloggers and traditional journalists’ (Rouse, 2006). In general, blogosphere is the particular media form that allows users to post short or long texts, comment on others’ articles and share their interests in such a public sphere.
The blogosphere is made up with all the forms of blogs includes Google Blog and micro blog platforms such as Twitter and Sina microblog. ‘It also a term some writers have used to describe the grassroots and interactive journalism in blogs and the symbiotic relationship between bloggers and traditional journalists’ (Rouse, 2006). In general, blogosphere is the particular media form that allows users to post short or long texts, comment on others’ articles and share their interests in such a public sphere.
(This is the capture picture of my Twitter)
Public
sphere defines as an area in social life that individuals can come together to
discuss freely and identify social issues. Public sphere provides a site to let
the publicity discuss with their thoughts and opinions. The audience will fully
engage in the activities in public sphere by using various communication devices.
In relating to blogosphere, it provides the entry in a wide range to those
audiences and writers to assume people involve in the public discussion area
independently.
Apparently,
most bloggers like writing in personal and diary-style observations to record
some interesting things during their social life looking forward comments. ‘But
when they write about politics, bloggers tend to focus on issues within their
own country, and are more often than not critical of domestic political
leaders’ (Etling etc, 2009). This is true because domestic bloggers are more
likely to stand for their country policy and political leaders due to their
growing background, and be more affected by the native situations. In that
case, blogosphere could not act in an impartial way because of the various blog
writers are in different country background. Additionally, when people talk
about foreign political issues, they may not give a just view in terms of they
focus less on international news partly, and easily be influenced by others’
opinions.
Blogosphere
gives a free media platform to arouse people independent ideas, opinions even
critical judgments in some popular news. However, with some sensitive political
issues, there still exists a part of limitations due to some particular policy
in some countries. For example, in China, any articles associating with the
seditious speech or reactionary doctrine are be banned in discussion in public
sphere also includes those public blogs.
Rouse,
M 2006, ‘Blogosphere’, Retrieved on
March 2006, <http://searchsoa.techtarget.com/definition/blogosphere >.
Etling,
B Kelly, J Faris R and Palfrey J 2009, ‘Mapping
the Arabic Blogosphere: Politics, Culture and Dissent’, Berkman Center for
Internet and Society, Harvard University <http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/publications/2009/Mapping_the_Arabic_Blogosphere
>.
Great blog. The use of the ‘public sphere’ definition made your post easy to understand and read, and allows for all readers to participate in your blog whether they have a knowledge of public sphere or not. The post was very structurally sound as the question at the start ("Can the blogosphere act as independent and impartial public sphere?") was clearly answered at the end. Your use of multiple references added to the credibility of your post. Your example of communist china was very relevant as it put the blog topic on a global scale and commented on globalisation. There were a few grammatical errors that slightly hindered the flow of the piece but due to your sound structure were not critical. Great post! Keep it up.
ReplyDeleteHi there!
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your post, I agree with the comment above that I also found it particularly informative and straightforward to follow. You made a really clear comparison between the public sphere and the blogosphere, as well as how you also used a print screen of your personal Twitter account as a great example of the public sphere. You raise a valid point in regards to China and the media, would have liked to read a little more on the issue of their strict government and the censorship and the internet. Really good example though.
Thanks,
Catherine